Change for loops of the form:
for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_MP_NUM_CPUS; i++)
...
to
unsigned int num_cpus = arch_num_cpus();
for (i = 0; i < num_cpus; i++)
...
We do the call outside of the for loop so that it only happens once,
rather than on every iteration.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@intel.com>
As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of
<zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the
Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a
catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to
include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or
subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc.
The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible
anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for
example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel,
drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header
would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that
an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level
headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though.
NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage
in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I
understand many people will have concerns.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Add a bunch of missing "zephyr/" prefixes to #include statements in
various test and test framework files.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@google.com>
A separate privileged stack is used when CONFIG_GEN_PRIV_STACKS=y. The
main stack guard area is no longer needed and can be made available to
the application upon transitioning to user mode. And that's actually
required if we want a naturally aligned power-of-two buffer to let the
PMP map a NAPOT entry on it which is the whole point of having this
CONFIG_PMP_POWER_OF_TWO_ALIGNMENT option in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <npitre@baylibre.com>
In order to bring consistency in-tree, migrate all tests to the new
prefix <zephyr/...>. Note that the conversion has been scripted, refer
to #45388 for more details.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Fix the broken logic in the kernel/thread_stack test
The modified test should do direct read & write from estimated stack
pointer to highest address in the stack buffer.
Previously this test was start from lowest address in the stack
which would trigger exception of hardware stack checking scheme
violation on ARC boards and other targets with hardware stack
overflow detection.
Signed-off-by: Yuguo Zou <yuguo.zou@synopsys.com>
In the file variable val is not initialized,
causing the variable stack_ptr, pos, points to uninitialized data.
Initialize the variable val according to the code and commits.
Fixes#37916
Signed-off-by: Naiyuan Tian <naiyuan.tian@intel.com>
Move to CMake 3.20.0.
At the Toolchain WG it was decided to move to CMake 3.20.0.
The main reason for increasing CMake version is better toolchain
support.
Better toolchain support is added in the following CMake versions:
- armclang, CMake 3.15
- Intel oneAPI, CMake 3.20
- IAR, CMake 3.15 and 3.20
Signed-off-by: Torsten Rasmussen <Torsten.Rasmussen@nordicsemi.no>
Thread stack memory on coherence platforms needs to be linked into a
special section (so it can be cached).
Also, the test_idle_stack case just can't work with coherence. It's
measuring the CPU's idle stack's unused data, which was initialized at
boot from CPU0, and not necessarily the CPU on which the test is
running. In practice on intel_adsp_cavs15, our CPU has stale zeroes
in the cache for its unused stack area (presumably from a firmware
memory clear at boot or something?). Making this work would require a
cache invalidate on all CPUs at boot time before the idle threads
start, we can't do it here in the test because we don't know where the
idle stack pointer is.
Too much work for an esoteric stack size test, basically. Just
disable on these platforms.
Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
Increase the heap memory pool size in the
prj_armv8m_mpu_stack_guard.conf, to match
the value in the default configuration in
proj.conf (and fix an out-of memory issue
when allocating a kernel object).
Signed-off-by: Ioannis Glaropoulos <Ioannis.Glaropoulos@nordicsemi.no>
This test was written to use a TINY system heap (64 bytes) from which
it has to allocate on behalf of a userspace process. The change in
convention from mem_pool (where the byte count now includes metadata
overhead) means it runs out of space. Bump to 192 bytes. Still tiny.
Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
Show that trampolining thread self-aborts to the idle thread
works and that we have sufficiently set the idle stack size
for this, PM hooks, and dynamic kernel object cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
Possibly copypasta, or improvements to the test, either way
this test doesn't use that much RAM especially if memory
protection isn't active.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
There are predictable relationships between the actual size
of a stack object, the return value of K_*_STACK_SIZEOF() macros,
and the original size passed in when the stack was declared.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
These stacks are appropriate for threads that run purely in
supervisor mode, and also as stacks for interrupt and exception
handling.
Two new arch defines are introduced:
- ARCH_KERNEL_STACK_GUARD_SIZE
- ARCH_KERNEL_STACK_OBJ_ALIGN
New public declaration macros:
- K_KERNEL_STACK_RESERVED
- K_KERNEL_STACK_EXTERN
- K_KERNEL_STACK_DEFINE
- K_KERNEL_STACK_ARRAY_DEFINE
- K_KERNEL_STACK_MEMBER
- K_KERNEL_STACK_SIZEOF
If user mode is not enabled, K_KERNEL_STACK_* and K_THREAD_STACK_*
are equivalent.
Separately generated privilege elevation stacks are now declared
like kernel stacks, removing the need for K_PRIVILEGE_STACK_ALIGN.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
Currently for informational purposes, although we do check that
the carveout is smaller than the stack_size.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
thread->stack_info is now much more well maintained. Make these
tests that validate that user mode has no access just outside
the bounds of it, instead of the entire object.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
