The macro is intended to abstract the -ffreestanding compiler option
which tells the compiler that this is a bare metal env. The option is
compiler and thus toolchain specific, but this macro leaves it up to
the toolchain to decide the value of the option.
The intent here is to abstract Zephyr's dependence on toolchains,
thus allowing for easier porting to other, perhaps commercial,
toolchains and/or usecases.
No functional change expected.
Signed-off-by: Danny Oerndrup <daor@demant.com>
Update the files which contain no license information with the
'Apache-2.0' SPDX license identifier. Many source files in the tree are
missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance
tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of Zephyr, which is Apache version 2.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
When we build with newlib we don't set -nostdinc. In that case make
sure that we leave it to the toolchain to set the system include paths.
The one exception to leaving to the toolchain to set the system include
paths is the path to the newlib headers. Since we build
with -ffreestanding we need to make sure the newlib header path is the
before the toolchain headers. Otherwise the toolchain's 'freestanding'
headers get picked up and that causes issues (for example getting PRI*64
defined properly from inttypes.h due to __STDC_HOSTED__ being '0').
For newlib we accomplish this by having the only system header specified
by zephyr_system_include_directories() being just the newlib headers.
Note: for minlibc we leave things alone as things just happen to work as
the -I include of the libc headers takes precedence over -isystem so we
get the libc headers over the toolchain ones. For the newlib case it
appears that setting both -I and -isystem for the same dir causes the
-I to be ignored.
Fixes#14310
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@linaro.org>
- newlib needs c standard includes (so no -nostdinc)
- xcc needs toolchain headers (so no -nostdinc)
- with host gcc:
- x86_64 should not build with standard includes (-nostdinc needed)
- native_posix should build with standard include (no -nostdinc)
..
..
To simplify, abstract this and move it to compilers/toolchains and still
depend on what the application wants.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>